Variety, March 11, 1996
THE OMEN
TABMAGS HOPE SYNDIE CYCLE
HASN'T SPUN AWAY
by JIM BENSON
Now that the bubble has burst in the saturated syndicated talkshow arena
-- six yakkers have died so far this season, two more are on the critical
list and even such returning hits as "Ricki Lake" are in trouble -- the industry
is shifting its concern to the crowded magazine field.
Syndicated entertainment and tabloid magazines veered off the fast track
about two or three years ago, when they started to see their numbers erode
in the important primetime access hour. In the wake of another poor sweeps
perf, the troubled genre is beginning to receive more attention.
The Nielsen national barter rankings overlapping the four weeks of the February
sweeps, when viewing levels are at their highest, tell the story:
Paramount's top-rated "Entertainment Tonight" climbs from a 9.2 rating in
February '93 to 9.6 the following year, then collapses to 7.8 last winter
and 7.1 in the most recent four-week period.
In its second year, Warner Bros.' "Extra" slips 3% to 3.8 as it undergoes
a metamorphosis from entertainment to a People magazine-oriented format.
King World's "Inside Edition" declines every year since February '93 (8.6,
8.1, 6.6 and 6.4). Its companion, "American Journal," holds steady at 4.9
for the first two years before dropping to 4.3 and finally, 4.1.
Par's "Hard Copy" soars from 6.6 in '93 to 7.8 in '94, but crashes to 6.4
a year ago and 5.2 last month.
And the once-dominant and now-canceled Twentieth TV magazine "A Current Affair"
dives 61% from 8.2 in February '93 to a 3.2 in its final February outing
this year.
Fingering O.J.
Syndicators blame their troubles during the 1994-95 season on the O.J. Simpson
trial, which siphoned women viewers over the age of 55 to CNN, CNBC and other
outlets.
This season, the culprits are two hit off-net sitcoms that appear in access,
"Home Improvement" and "Seinfeld."
The numbers support the theory. Nielsen metered market results from the recently
concluded sweeps period show that all the big syndie programs in access,
including the stalwarts "Wheel of Fortune" and "Jeopardy!" fell year-to-year
against the two comedies -- particularly "Home," which is generating ratings
and demos not seen since the off-net debut of "The Cosby Show" in the late
1980s.
In afternoon early fringe time periods, where the new sitcoms are not a factor,
"Inside" remained flat year-to-year, "Journal" inched up a fraction and "Extra"
was flat. In fact, the only magazine to show household erosion in the daypart
was "Hard Copy," which sank to a 5.5 rating from 5.9.
Youngsters fickle
Researchers note that younger viewers, those in the 18-34 and 18-49 age groups,
are generally the first people to check out a new show and also the first
to defect. They led the charge away from gameshows to magazines, and now
they're turning from magazines to sitcoms.
"'Wheel' and 'Jeopardy!' have totally lost their young-adult base," a researcher
says. "The same thing happened earlier with successful shows like 'Tic Tac
Dough' and 'The Joker's Wild,' ... the 'Dating' and 'Newlywed' games. They
lost their 18-49 core, got old and went away. It's all part of the cycle
with firstrun shows in the access time period."
To give them a fighting chance against the new and powerful competition,
the magazines have all tinkered with their formats to one degree or another.
Virtually all of them have added more sex to attract younger viewers.
But a programming exec complains that they are all simply "throwing a lot
of shit at the wall and seeing what sticks. ... I think that all the shows
look the same. Nothing is really standing out among the magazines. People
have passed on being loyal to one show."
Another high-ranking exec for a major syndicator acknowledges that "a lot
of these shows are stepping on each other."
Some wonder whether the magazines will ever regain the ratings ground they've
lost. Worse, they worry that the genre will continue to erode.
Off-net impact
Paul Power, VP of research for King World, says "Home" and "Seinfeld" will
continue to impact magazines through at least the 1996-97 season. Most stations
generally keep strong off-net comedies in access slots for two years before
they weaken and get moved to other time periods.
Still, most syndicators don't expect to see a shakeout in the magazine genre
anytime soon. In fact, NBC and New World are tossing a new entertainment
magazine, "Access Hollywood," into the fray this fall.
To be profitable, the conventional industry wisdom is that magazines with
budgets in the range of $ 350,000-$ 450,000 per week have to maintain at
least a 4.5 household rating.
Of the two surviving series that are both below that rating and are believed
to be in the price ballpark, "Extra" has the backing of deep-pocketed Warner
Bros., and "Journal" can likely get away with a smaller number because of
its ability to share resources with "Inside."
Although sitcoms are probably the biggest reason for this season's ratings
decline among syndie magazines, other factors are also at work.
Magazine glut
One of the most frequently cited is the proliferation of primetime network
magazines -- "Dateline NBC" alone will expand to four nights this month --
that are going after the same stories.
Jack Fentress, VP-director of programming for the station rep firm Petry
National TV, says the growing number of network magazines "means that viewers
don't have to sit and wait for 'Hard Copy,' 'Inside Edition' or 'Entertainment
Tonight' to get the same information anymore. There is just so much of it
out there. ... It's so much like talkshows. Sooner or later, it reaches the
point where there is overload. It's not necessarily the fault of the syndicated
shows."
King World's Power disagrees, saying individuals drawn to magazines will
probably watch the show that comes on at 7 p.m. as well as the one at 10.
Cable levels up
Meanwhile, cable viewing levels -- while not as high as they were last year
during the Simpson saga -- remain above their pretrial levels. Power estimates
the cable viewership has risen 25% over the past five years, but is still
relatively low compared to broadcast TV.
Additionally, magazines are facing more competition from news and information
programming on TV and Internet on-line services. There's also the political
backlash against trash TV and, in what one exec calls "the natural progression
of TV," the fact that many of the magazines are growing old.
Trying to explain the downward slide of the magazines, a syndie exec sums
it up this way: "The whole is greater than the sum of the parts. There are
a whole lot of factors at work here."